What is the difference between a subpoena and a summons?
A summons is a formal court notice telling someone they are being sued (or, in criminal cases, must appear) and generally requires a response within a set deadline to avoid a default judgment. A subpoena is a legal order compelling someone — often a witness or a third party, not necessarily a party to the case — to testify, appear, or produce documents, and it can be issued even if that person is not being sued.
What a summons does
A summons is typically issued alongside a complaint when a lawsuit is filed, and it formally notifies the defendant that they have been sued and must respond within a specific deadline, often within a few weeks depending on the jurisdiction. Being served with a summons makes someone a party to the case, meaning they have the right (and generally the obligation) to respond, or risk a default judgment being entered against them.
Summonses can also appear outside civil lawsuits — for example, a criminal summons directing someone to appear in court to answer charges, rather than being arrested. In both contexts, the summons establishes that the recipient is now formally part of a legal proceeding.
What a subpoena does
A subpoena is a legal order requiring someone to do something specific related to a case — commonly to testify at a deposition or trial (a subpoena ad testificandum), or to produce documents or records (a subpoena duces tecum). Unlike a summons, a subpoena can be directed at someone who is not a party to the lawsuit at all, such as a witness, an employer with relevant records, or a third-party business.
Subpoenas are typically issued by an attorney or the court as part of the discovery process or trial preparation, and they carry legal force — ignoring a valid subpoena without a proper legal objection can result in being held in contempt of court.
Key practical differences
A summons makes someone a party to a lawsuit with obligations to formally respond to the claims against them; a subpoena obligates someone — whether or not they are a party — to provide testimony or documents relevant to someone else's case. Someone who receives a subpoena is not being sued and has not been accused of wrongdoing merely by being subpoenaed.
The deadlines and required responses also differ: a summons generally requires filing a formal answer or response with the court, while a subpoena generally requires appearing at a specified time and place, or producing specified documents, sometimes with the option to object or seek to limit the subpoena's scope through the court.
What to do if you receive either one
If served with a summons, responding by the stated deadline is critical — missing it can result in a default judgment without ever having the chance to present a defense. Consulting an attorney promptly after being served helps ensure the response is properly filed and any defenses are preserved.
If served with a subpoena, reviewing what is actually being requested — and whether there are valid grounds to object, such as the request being overly broad, privileged, or unduly burdensome — is an important step before simply complying or ignoring it. An attorney can help evaluate whether to comply, negotiate the scope, or formally challenge the subpoena in court.
- Can I be sued just by receiving a subpoena?
- No. A subpoena by itself does not make someone a defendant in a lawsuit — it is a request or order for testimony or documents related to a case involving other parties. Being a witness or a document custodian under a subpoena is legally different from being sued.
- What happens if I ignore a subpoena?
- Ignoring a valid subpoena without a proper legal objection can result in being held in contempt of court, which can carry penalties. If there is a legitimate reason to resist complying — such as the request being overly broad or seeking privileged information — the proper approach is generally to file an objection or motion with the court rather than simply not responding.
This page is an educational explainer, not legal advice, and creates no attorney–client relationship. Juricratic is a simulation engine: every probability-like figure is a dial you set, not a calibrated prediction. Verify every rule, deadline, and figure against the authorities and orders that govern your matter.
Run the numbers on your own case.
Juricratic models a lawsuit as a solvable game — settlement value, risk, and the optimal line, all live as the facts change.
Request access →