Brackets (Mediation Bargaining Technique)
A negotiation technique where each side proposes a conditional range to narrow the settlement gap without committing to a single number.
Bracketing lets each side signal movement without exposing a firm bottom line. One side proposes a range, such as offering to move its demand down to a lower figure if the other side moves its offer up to a matching figure, and the offer is expressly conditional on the other side's reciprocal move.
Brackets typically narrow over several rounds as the mediator shuttles them between caucuses, gradually compressing the gap between demand and offer until the parties are close enough for a single-number exchange or a mediator's proposal.
In Juricratic, bracketing is modeled as an iterative narrowing operation on the settlement-range dial: each accepted bracket round tightens the upper and lower bounds of the simulated zone of possible agreement, letting the engine track convergence, or stalling, across the negotiation branch.
How it actually shows up
Mediators propose brackets when direct demand-offer exchanges have stalled or moved too slowly, since a bracket lets each party test the other's willingness to move without committing to a specific dollar figure until both sides have effectively pre-agreed to the range.
- Is a bracket offer binding once proposed?
- No. A bracket is conditional and non-binding until the other side matches it and both sides confirm the resulting numbers.
- Who typically proposes the first bracket?
- Either side can, though mediators often suggest bracketing once they sense both sides are ready to move but reluctant to go first.
- What happens if the other side rejects a bracket outright?
- Nothing is lost or conceded. Since the offer was conditional, a rejected bracket does not become the rejecting party's new floor or ceiling.
This page is an educational explainer, not legal advice, and creates no attorney–client relationship. Juricratic is a simulation engine: every probability-like figure is a dial you set, not a calibrated prediction. Verify every rule, deadline, and figure against the authorities and orders that govern your matter.
Turn the concept into a modeled matter.
Juricratic makes every one of these ideas a live dial: model your case as a solvable game, then watch the optimal line and the settlement window move as the assumptions do.
Request access →